Best match

Most recent

Account

Social media

The Federal University Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE), has again alerted members of the public on faked social media accounts of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Abayomi Sunday Fasina, adding that this time the impostors have stepped up their game. Speaking through his ...

FUOYE VC Alerts Public On Cloned Social Media Accounts

Deseret News

Freed, centers on a Facebook account belonging to James Freed ... an elected official violates the First Amendment when he or she blocks constituents on social media. That’s the same question that was at the center of an earlier battle over then-Presiden ...

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVFT.y_hiZv4siU7fUmNNnceUHC&pid=News

Why the Supreme Court discussed dog and baby pictures this week

deseret

Maryland

Southern Maryland

Maryland, the District of Columbia and 40 other states are suing Meta alleging that its platforms cause harm to children by building addictive features, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown announced Tuesday.

Maryland joins DC, 40 other states suing Meta, claiming mental health harms to children

https://www.bing.com/th?id=ODF.BkZjdilzng5radYD4l6Q-g&pid=news

Southern Maryland County Times

San Francisco Bay Area

Anchialine pool

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is warning visitors to Alviso Marina County Park not to go down to the shores of the pink salt pond.

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVFT.5dWyyXv740oIn8YOJymgoi&pid=News

Bay Area pink pond suffers from social media influencers

https://www.bing.com/th?id=ODF.WkQMg48KbQNzKIEJreAcIQ&pid=news

SFGate

European Union

The European data regulator has agreed to extend a ban imposed by non-EU member Norway on "behavioural advertising" on Facebook and Instagram to cover all 30 countries in the European Union and the European Economic Area,

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVFT.q7a2QYAL1By_RltvsJrTaC&pid=News

Facebook owner Meta faces EU ban on targeted advertising

https://www.bing.com/th?id=ODF.6l3fMUjuba1Bx26WywDhqQ&pid=news

In a world increasingly connected by the invisible tendrils of the internet, the theatre of war is no longer confined to the physical realm. The battle of narratives, fought on the digital battleground of social media,

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVFT.qqwBV-944kvO-sqnBaH91i&pid=News

Al-Shabaab’s Social Media Strategy Links Gaza and Somalia for Greater Influence

BNN Breaking on MSN.com

Social media can make our children feel more lonely and isolated, even though it is supposed to connect them with others.

‘Social media hurts’: Maryland doctors plead for action to protect young people | GUEST COMMENTARY

https://www.bing.com/th?id=ODF.M9GXSLPIQGp0PH0Q6ZcjjQ&pid=news

The Baltimore Sun

At issue before the Supreme Court is the intersection between government officials, social media users and the First Amendment.

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVFT.IDcBvkVWu59GtAjXAHCZuy&pid=News

Supreme Court considers when the government can block followers on social media

https://www.bing.com/th?id=ODF.L-M1svepnRh9KZSGufy9Qg&pid=news

WJCL

David Fincher

The Social Network

David Fincher and Aaron Sorkin express interest in creating The Social Network 2, potentially revisiting the complex world of Facebook and its controversies.

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVFT.uVpIly4q6x3aPjH5wPSmoi&pid=News

David Fincher And Aaron Sorking Want To Make The Social Network 2

small-screen

Salem

Brain

WHO (the World Health Organization) published strict guidelines about children’s screen time. Why? Because intensive digital media use is thought to reduce working memory capacity, cause psychological problems from depression to anxiety and sleep disorders,

Social media: May change your kid’s brain

https://www.bing.com/th?id=ODF.nDB9wrcERV-SbGR-FxwBCQ&pid=news

Salem News

Facebook, Inc. operates a social networking website. The Company website allows people to communicate with their family, friends, and coworkers. Facebook develops technologies that facilitate the sharing of information, photographs, website links, and videos. Facebook users have the ability to share and...

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. We want to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. To do that, we ask that you help create a safe and respectful online space. These community values encourage constructive conversations on this page: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. So please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit http://www.facebookcareers.com

Facebook

298 Stories To Learn About Facebook

In the world of social media, we expect a certain level of safety and security. We trust platforms like Facebook to provide a space where we can connect with friends, share our lives, and engage with the online community. But what happens when the very platform that's meant to protect us ends up doing just the opposite? Just today, I found myself in a frustrating situation that left me baffled and infuriated. I encountered a on Facebook who was trying to pull off the typical SEO link-building scam, and I took it upon myself to report this individual for their deceptive behavior. scammer He was attempting to sell me a bunch of PBN links via a Facebook group. After checking them, I found they were all penalized domains on sites with no templates, no SSL certificates, full of spammy casino content & links, and not a single article indexed in the search engines. This parasite scammer, flogging these off as “Quality PBNs,” was well aware of what he was selling and that the PBN domains were dead. He was fully aware that he was attempting to pull off a link-building scam and knew the product was defective. Little did I know that this simple act of self-defense would result in Facebook suspending me for seven days while the scammer continued their illicit activities unhindered. Funny that this scummy parasite scam flogs called me dog and son of a bitch. Yet I got banned, and flea lives on. Let me be clear: reporting a scammer should be a no-brainer. It's something that should be encouraged and supported by all social media platforms, including Facebook. Users should feel empowered to speak out against those who are trying to deceive, manipulate, or harm them. So, imagine my shock when I found myself penalized for trying to protect myself and others from a scammer. Not only did I report the scam, but I also had some choice words for the scammer. I called him a "worthless scam beggar" and let them know that their attempts to deceive me were utterly futile. While I understand that maintaining a respectful tone in our online interactions is crucial, it's essential to recognize the intent behind my message. I was trying to protect myself and others from a potential threat. The larger issue here is . They need to invest in better moderation systems, clearer guidelines, and a more transparent reporting process to prevent innocent users from getting caught in the crossfire. Facebook's responsibility to ensure its users' safety It's not about promoting a culture of online negativity but rather about striking a balance between self-defense and community protection. Scammers and fraudsters are persistent, and it's up to social media platforms to keep up with their evolving tactics. The incident I experienced is just one example of the challenges these platforms face when handling scams and fraudulent activities effectively. Facebook, like all social media giants, should continually improve its reporting and enforcement systems to better protect its users and create a safer online environment for everyone. In the end, it's a reminder for all of us to stay vigilant and cautious in the digital world. Trust your instincts and report suspicious activity, but always be mindful of your tone when dealing with potential scammers. (Facebook will always Favour the scammer in this case - tired and proven countless times) Because of Facebook’s deplorable actions, I personally hope for a future where Facebook becomes a mere relic of the past, who can't afford their own internet connections, leeching off their neighbors' Wi-Fi. overrun by scammers It's a vision where a newer, fresher, and more socially acceptable platform takes over, one that genuinely cares about protecting its users from scams and fraudulent activities. Perhaps then, and I hope Facebook will become a digital wasteland, and they would more than deserve that fate, especially given their history with me. Let's hope that Facebook and other social media platforms learn from incidents like these so they can provide the safety and security their users deserve. In my own personal opinion. Facebook is a disgrace and a poor example of current-day social acceptance and online behavior. It protects scammers over potential victims. The platform makes me sick. Long live TikTok & LinkedIn (Where the real people go these days)

Facebook Fiasco: Banning the Victim, Not the Scammer"

In the labyrinth of the digital age, where fake profiles thrive and tarnish the online experience, we find ourselves in the confounding realm of . Facebook Here, we unveil a saga of deception, focusing on a character known as "Lucy Audrey" – a prime exemplar of the fake profile menace and the absurdity of Facebook's refusal to suspend such accounts. The Era of Fake Profiles & Scammers: Lucy Audrey Unveiled Meet "Lucy Audrey," a fictional persona operated by an individual from Faisalabad, Pakistan, who shamelessly touts digital marketing and search engine optimization services. The irony runs deep - an individual claiming expertise in an industry requiring skill and experience is, in reality, a glaring amateur. It's beyond pathetic; it's comical. In an era where advanced technology and AI rule the roost, Facebook's inability to detect an account that reeks of fake identity is nothing short of absurd. "Lucy Audrey" is a male scammer from Faisalabad, Pakistan. It's so ludicrous that it's laughable. Facebook's (Oh, I mean Fakebook’s) Disheartening Betrayal is a slap in the face to anyone who values online safety and security. The platform's unwillingness to remove an account that blatantly peddles services it knows nothing about is an outrageous betrayal of user trust. Facebook's refusal to suspend this egregiously fake profile In my humble opinion, Facebook's algorithms appear finely tuned for one purpose: keeping user retention rates high, even at the expense of tolerating absurdly . They prioritize user retention over eradicating profiles run by individuals who couldn't distinguish a blog post from a hole in the ground. fake profiles Testing the Waters: A Tale of Deception Curiosity led me to test the waters. I decided to engage one of these dubious "experts" to place a blog post on a website for one of my digital marketing clients. The outcome was nothing short of a farce. The faker took my money, placed the content with a website owner, didn't pay the site owner, and disappeared with the entire payment. I was left with a case of fraud and an empty wallet. This is a prime example of Facebook's failure to protect its community. It's shocking how they allow these charlatans to roam free, masquerading as "professionals" and "experts." My experiment only cost me $10, and I'm grateful that at least PayPal has robust protections. The Farcical "Meta Verified" Badge In recent times, Facebook's attempt to monetize authenticity has reached new heights of absurdity. Every time I log in, a message hijacks my screen, urging me to get a "Meta Verified" badge for a mere $19.99 per month, as if paying for a digital badge can prove my existence. While Facebook pushes me, a legitimate user since its inception, to pay for a badge of authenticity, it remains plagued by thousands of obvious fake profiles, including the infamous "Lucy Audrey." Facebook's desperation for user retention has reached ridiculous levels. They even allow users to create four additional profiles under one account, opening the floodgates for imposters and scammers. I mean, what a joke! I have now gone on to report countless profiles that Fakebook refuses to suspend, and then in response, they wave the annoying Meta Verified badge in my face every day, “urging me” to hand over my hard-earned cash once a month to “verify myself.” Pathetic! The Sisyphean Task of Reporting Fake Profiles Picture this: Day in and day out, I've scoured Facebook, diligently reporting one fake profile after another. Each one is more obvious than the last, yet my efforts seem to fall on deaf ears. The frustration that accompanies hitting that "report" button has become a daily ritual, and it's one that always ends in disappointment. The 100% Ignored Reports Yes, you read that correctly - 100%. Every single report I've submitted, without exception, has been met with the crushing silence of Facebook's inaction. It's as if my concerns, along with those of countless others, vanish into the digital abyss, never to be acknowledged or addressed. The accounts I've reported are the epitome of fakery. They sport stolen images, nonsensical information, and a clear disregard for the platform's rules and regulations. It's not rocket science; it's plain as day. But it seems that Facebook's moderation team is blind to the most blatant transgressions. Yes, you read that correctly - 100%. Every single report I've submitted, without exception, has been met with the crushing silence of Facebook's inaction. It's as if my concerns, along with those of countless others, vanish into the digital abyss, never to be acknowledged or addressed. The accounts I've reported are the epitome of fakery, including fake profiles and even parasites who have attempted to scam me. They sport stolen images, nonsensical information, and a clear disregard for the platform's rules and regulations. It's not rocket science; it's plain as day. But it seems that Facebook's moderation team is blind to the most blatant transgressions. The Endless Loop of Inaction What's particularly frustrating is the endless loop of inaction. You'd think that a platform as massive and influential as Facebook would have the resources and technology to tackle this issue effectively. However, the reality is that countless individuals, including myself, are trapped in a cycle of reporting fake profiles with no end in sight. A Mockery of "Community Standards" Facebook's adherence to "Community Standards" is nothing short of a farce when it fails to protect users from scam artists like this Pakistani man’s alias " ." Lucy Audrey This incident is not isolated but a glaring example of Facebook's disregard for user safety and integrity. It's high time for Facebook to stop paying lip service to its users' concerns and take concrete action against fake profiles on its platform. In my tireless crusade to report fake profiles, I'm not alone. There are countless others who have experienced the same frustration, the same disappointment, and the same betrayal of trust. It's time for Facebook to step up, take action, and fulfill its responsibility to its users. The evidence is clear: countless fake profiles roam free on Facebook, and the platform's disregard for these transgressions is nothing short of a slap in the face. It's a betrayal of user trust, and it’s high time for Facebook to rectify this glaring issue. It's also clear that Mr. Zuckerberg couldn't care less about the safety of Facebook’s users. As long as the cash keeps rolling in and stocks remain high, it appears that this social media platform will continue to fling the floodgates wide open for scammers and fake profile parasites.

Meet Lucy Audrey, The Dishonest Fake Profile Facebook Refuses to Suspend

লুসি অড্রের সাথে দেখা করুন, অসৎ জাল প্রোফাইল ফেসবুক সাসপেন্ড করতে অস্বীকার করেছে

Lernen Sie Lucy Audrey kennen, das unehrliche Fake-Profil, das Facebook nicht sperren lässt

Conoce a Lucy Audrey, el perfil falso deshonesto que Facebook se niega a suspender

Rencontrez Lucy Audrey, le faux profil malhonnête que Facebook refuse de suspendre

लूसी ऑड्रे से मिलें, बेईमान नकली प्रोफ़ाइल फेसबुक ने निलंबित करने से इनकार कर दिया

Facebookが停止を拒否した不誠実な偽プロフィール、ルーシー・オードリーを紹介する

부정직한 가짜 프로필인 Lucy Audrey를 만나보세요. Facebook은 정지를 거부합니다.

Conheça Lucy Audrey, o perfil falso desonesto que o Facebook se recusa a suspender

Знакомьтесь, Люси Одри, нечестный фейковый профиль, который Facebook отказывается приостанавливать

Facebook'un Askıya Almayı Reddettiği Sahtekar Sahte Profil Lucy Audrey ile tanışın

Gặp Lucy Audrey, Hồ sơ giả mạo không trung thực Facebook từ chối đình chỉ

认识露西·奥黛丽 (Lucy Audrey)，Facebook 拒绝暂停不诚实的虚假个人资料

I've had it up to here with Facebook's ongoing indifference when it comes to tackling the persistent issue of fake profiles and fraudulent operations in the digital marketing sphere. In an industry that's constantly evolving and demanding adaptability, Facebook's lackluster approach is a thorn in our collective sides. Fake profiles and fraudulent activities on social media platforms have been a pain in our necks for ages. Whether it's identity theft, spamming, or fake advertisements, these shenanigans wreak havoc on businesses and consumers alike. But Facebook, the Goliath of social networks seems content with giving only to address these problems. lip service We've seen this tired old script play out time and time again. Facebook acknowledges the problem, throws out some vague promises of change, and then, like a magician with no tricks up his sleeve, delivers next to nothing. It's infuriating, to say the least. So, what's the big deal? Why should we care about these fake profiles and scams? The consequences are much more profound than Facebook seems to realize. Trust, my friends, trust is the most valuable currency in the digital marketing world. When you undermine that trust with deceptive practices, you compromise the authenticity of the connections and interactions that are the lifeblood of the digital marketing landscape Users start becoming skeptics, second-guessing even legitimate content, and worst of all, deciding to leave digital spaces altogether. For businesses, the financial toll is real. They're forced into this endless cat-and-mouse game with . They invest countless resources combating these scams that could be better spent on growth and innovation. And let's not forget the damage to their reputation when their customers fall prey to these fraudulent operations. Facebook fraudsters But the most exasperating question of all: Why hasn't Facebook, with all its power and resources, been more effective in tackling these issues? They've dabbled in efforts here and there, but it feels like they're playing a perpetual game of catch-up instead of being proactive. It's time for Facebook to step up its game and take a more assertive stance. No more half-measures, no more empty promises. It's high time they send a clear message to those misusing their platform: fraud and deception will not be tolerated. Yet, the responsibility doesn't lie solely with Facebook. This issue demands a concerted effort from the entire digital marketing community and the public. It's not a problem just for users. It's a collective challenge that Facebook, as a major player in the digital landscape, must address proactively. Facebook, The Colossal Letdown! Oh, Facebook, you colossal letdown! It's infuriating how this social media giant continues to shield scammers, spammers, fake profiles, and allows fraudulent operations to persist. The fact that Facebook still hasn't managed to tackle the plague of fake profiles and fraudulent activities is mind-boggling. It's like watching a never-ending circus of deception and deceit, where the bad actors thrive, while the rest of us are left exasperated and defenseless. Fake Profiles Let's talk about fake profiles, shall we? These nefarious imposters invade the platform, stealing people's identities and spreading disinformation with reckless abandon. You'd think that with Facebook's resources and technology, they'd have a handle on this by now. But no, the fake profiles continue to multiply, clogging our feeds with spurious content, scammy links, and downright lies. Spammers And what about the spammers? Facebook, it's as if you're hosting a never-ending spamfest where users are inundated with unsolicited advertisements and scams. These spammers parade around, exploiting the platform for personal gain while the rest of us are left to wade through the digital garbage they leave behind. Fraudulent Operations The real kicker is how Facebook allows fraudulent operations to flourish, even when they're blatantly reported. It's as if they're turning a blind eye to the cries of their users, letting these scammers run wild. How many times have we reported these fraudulent accounts and activities, only to see them continue unimpeded, like cockroaches surviving a nuclear apocalypse? One would expect that a platform as influential and ubiquitous as Facebook would have a robust system in place to weed out these charlatans. Yet, instead of being proactive, they react sluggishly, offering empty promises of change that never materialize. It's a disservice to its users, both individuals and businesses, who depend on the platform to connect, communicate, and conduct business. It’s about time Facebook to take real, decisive action against these bad actors, to step up and do their part to protect the integrity of their platform. It’s also time the tech giant to take a hard look in the mirror and make the necessary changes to create a safer, more trustworthy digital space for all. The tolerance of deception must come to an end. The frustration is palpable. Facebook's unwillingness to address the issue of scammers, spammers, fake profiles, and fraudulent operations is not only disappointing but also a disservice to the online community. Users deserve better, and the digital world, in general, should not have to suffer under the weight of Facebook's indifference. So, here's my rallying cry: Let's stop waiting around for Facebook to do the right thing. They must prioritize transparency, honesty, and accountability. But we, the digital marketing community and the broader public, need to get off our duffs and take a stand. Let's actively engage with this issue, demand accountability, and support initiatives to eradicate fraudulent practices. In a nutshell, the digital marketing industry thrives when it's built on trust and transparency. Facebook's reluctance to decisively tackle fake profiles and fraudulent operations is a hindrance to progress. It's time to raise our collective voice, demand accountability, and work together to create a safer, more honest digital marketing landscape that benefits everyone. It's time for action; it's time for change.

Facebook's Inexcusable Tolerance for Fake Profiles and Fraudulent Operations

ফেইক প্রোফাইল এবং প্রতারণামূলক অপারেশনের জন্য ফেসবুকের অমার্জনীয় সহনশীলতা

Facebooks unentschuldbare Toleranz gegenüber gefälschten Profilen und betrügerischen Operationen

La imperdonable tolerancia de Facebook hacia los perfiles falsos y las operaciones fraudulentas

La tolérance inexcusable de Facebook à l'égard des faux profils et des opérations frauduleuses

फर्जी प्रोफाइल और धोखाधड़ीपूर्ण संचालन के लिए फेसबुक की अक्षम्य सहनशीलता

Facebookの偽プロフィールと不正行為に対する許しがたい寛容さ

가짜 프로필 및 사기 행위에 대한 Facebook의 변명할 수 없는 관용

A tolerância indesculpável do Facebook para perfis falsos e operações fraudulentas

Непростительная терпимость Facebook к фейковым профилям и мошенническим операциям

Facebook'un Sahte Profillere ve Hileli Operasyonlara Karşı Bağışlanamaz Toleransı

Sự khoan dung không thể tha thứ của Facebook đối với hồ sơ giả mạo và hoạt động lừa đảo

Facebook 对虚假个人资料和欺诈操作的不可原谅的容忍

USA v. Google LLC Court Filing, retrieved on January 24, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 25 of 44. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here IV. GOOGLE’S SCHEME TO DOMINATE THE AD TECH STACK D. Google Responds to the Threat of Header Bidding by Further Excluding Rivals and Reinforcing Its Dominance 2. Google Blunts Header Bidding By “Drying Out” the Competition b) Google Further Stunts Header Bidding by Working to Bring Facebook and Amazon into Its Open Bidding Fold 187. Even before the rise of header bidding, Google had identified Facebook as a potential competitive threat. Facebook had at one point shown ambitions to challenge Google as a full-stack ad tech competitor, acquiring a publisher ad server in 2013 and a video advertising SSP in 2014, though both products were later shuttered. Years later, Facebook recognized that any full-stack ad tech strategy “is subject to one bottleneck and intermediary—Google. They ‘own’ the Ad Server, and hence the last mile relationship with publishers.” Facebook further observed that “[o]ther players in the market, such as Amazon, recognize that unseating Google, and its relationships with publishers is hard, and are also choosing to build on top of Google’s rails.” 188. Though it had abandoned its efforts to be a full-stack competitor, Facebook still aimed to grow its advertising business beyond its owned and operated (“O&O”) digital properties (e.g., Facebook Blue and Instagram apps), which were increasingly supplyconstrained. As the number of advertisers on these properties grew, demand threatened to outpace available inventory; Facebook sought publisher inventory outside Facebook to satisfy this unmet advertising demand. In 2014, it launched Facebook Audience Network (“FAN”), which Facebook described as the “power of Facebook ads, off-Facebook.” FAN allowed Facebook advertisers to extend their campaigns outside of Facebook O&O properties with a oneclick, opt-in button. 189. At launch, FAN primarily worked with mobile app advertisers to place ads in other mobile apps in order to drive app installs and engagement. It later expanded to open web on mobile devices. By 2016, FAN was participating in the growing header bidding movement, partnering with header bidding wrappers to submit real-time, simultaneous bids, and eventually launching full-scale header bidding in 2017. 190. As a large ad network connected to millions of Facebook advertisers, FAN also competed with Google to lock up available publisher inventory for its advertisers. Prior to joining Open Bidding, Facebook executives foresaw a status quo of “hand-to-hand combat” between the companies to secure access to sufficient inventory from publishers. Google feared such competition with Facebook would end up “eat[ing] margin,” and that Google might “respond identically” through deals with top publishers, thus “driving a price war.” Facebook was equally leery of such a future, with one executive fretting that the “significant investment required to lock up inventory through direct deals” with publishers would “[l]ikely start a race to the bottom on margin.” 191. Google took note of FAN’s launch and kept a wary eye on FAN as it grew, describing Facebook as “a unique competitive challenge for us, both short- and long-term” because of its “strength in ad formats and targeting.” Google understood Facebook’s reach with over a billion users, and it understood that just as Google had valuable targeting and demographic data from its O&O properties—including Search, Gmail, YouTube, Android, and Play Store—Facebook, too, had a massive amount of valuable data from its O&O properties. Even though Facebook had largely given up on building a direct competitor to Google’s publisher ad tech stack, Google saw looming “[d]isintermediation [t]hreats” to DFP from “[l]arge [n]etworks with unique data and advertiser scale seek[ing] direct inventory access[,] [g]oing direct to pubs or using existing [third-party] channels like Header Bidding.” By contrast, Google characterized full-stack competitors as “historical competition” of little concern: “This is a short-term threat and we are well positioned here.” 192. As FAN began to test and use header bidding, Google grew increasingly alarmed at “the existential threat posed by Header Bidding and FAN.” Google strategized over how to respond to FAN’s entry into header bidding, and in September 2016, Google laid out a plan to bring FAN into Google’s Open Bidding program. Significantly, Google concluded that bringing FAN demand into Open Bidding was a better alternative to slow publisher adoption of header bidding than “[a]ggressively mak[ing] [Open Bidding] much better than [header bidding].” 3. Rather than making a better product and competing on the merits, Google sought a deal with Facebook to bring FAN into Google’s Open Bidding—away from rival exchanges’ header bidding auctions—to “dry out” the nascent threat posed by header bidding. If competition with Facebook was inevitable, it would be better for Google to compete on a field it still controlled, with the many advantages it had constructed for itself, thus protecting DFP’s market dominance. Indeed, Google concluded that while it “[c]annot avoid competing with FAN,” it could, through a deal with Facebook, “build a moat around our demand.” And as Google’s product leadership would ultimately recommend to CEO Sundar Pichai, with a Google-Facebook deal, “[f]or web inventory, we will move [FAN’s] demand off of header bidding set up and further weaken the header bidding narrative in the marketplace.” Facebook, meanwhile, was frank in its assessment of Google’s motivation for the deal: “What Google wants: To kill header bidding (us baptizing [Open Bidding] will help significantly).” 194. Ultimately, in September 2018, after a long negotiation and approvals by each company’s top brass—including Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sheryl Sandberg—Google and Facebook entered into a “Network Bidding Agreement” (“NBA”). The deal provided Facebook with unique terms, including a contractual promise of no last look and direct remittance to publishers, ensuring that Facebook would continue to maintain its publisher-facing relationships. In exchange, Facebook committed to a minimum annual spend on Open Bidding and was incentivized, through an all-units, tiered volume discount, to shift spend to Open Bidding and away from possible alternative header bidding avenues. 195. Having tried and failed to challenge Google as full-stack competitor—in part because of Google’s anticompetitive conduct described above—Facebook ultimately resigned itself to operating on top of Google’s rails. While the NBA satisfied Facebook’s need for increased access to publisher inventory, Facebook recognized that it would also “reduce our future optionality to build our own ad tech and the likelihood of a newbie like Amazon[, which had introduced a header bidding wrapper,] succeeding.” Facebook believed that, while perhaps “inevitable,” the deal would nevertheless “accelerate Google’s stranglehold on ad tech.” Facebook’s then-VP of Partnerships opined that “by doing this deal, we will cement [Google’s] position of power.” 196. Amazon’s TAM posed a different competitive threat to Google’s dominance. It allowed publishers to solicit bids from multiple ad exchanges via a single call from a webpage to Amazon’s extensive network of servers. And Amazon took only a small one cent CPM fee— much lower than Open Bidding’s 5% fee—for every transaction that flowed through TAM. Google initially feared TAM could aggregate advertising demand in a way that challenged Google’s ad exchange and publisher ad server, leading Google to ask Amazon what it would take for Amazon to stop investing in its header bidding product. However, Amazon rebuffed such requests and continued to develop and deploy TAM. But as with other header bidding solutions, TAM could not fully circumvent all of the restrictions and preferences baked into Google’s ad tech products, which website publishers still relied upon. For example, TAM remained subject to a “last look” by Google’s ad exchange, allowing Google’s ad exchange to win any impression that would otherwise flow through TAM by matching the competing price from TAM. 197. Google’s Open Bidding—and Google’s efforts to shift the focus of other major ad tech companies like Facebook from header bidding toward Open Bidding—stunted header bidding’s adoption, leaving header bidding unable to pose a true threat to Google’s monopoly power. In doing so, Open Bidding achieved its goal of blunting the growth of header bidding and protecting Google’s publisher ad server. Today, Google still has its publisher ad server monopoly. Header bidding persisted, but its adoption stagnated. And Google turned to other, more surreptitious methods to restrain competition and “dry out” ad exchanges using header bidding. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-00108 retrieved on September 8, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. justice.gov

Google Brings Facebook and Amazon into Its Open Bidding Fold

Google incorpora a Facebook y Amazon a su proceso de licitación abierta

Google intègre Facebook et Amazon dans son programme d'enchères ouvertes

Google Facebook और Amazon को अपने ओपन बिडिंग फोल्ड में लाता है

Google、FacebookとAmazonを自社の公開入札に参加させる

Google traz Facebook e Amazon para seu grupo de licitações abertas

Google đưa Facebook và Amazon vào cuộc đấu thầu mở

谷歌将 Facebook 和亚马逊纳入公开竞价范围

Today, around 25% of Facebook accounts , with 70% of the victims being locked out of their accounts. And in many cases, the victim has no idea they've been hacked until it's too late. have been compromised 6 Signs Your Facebook Account Has Been Hacked Here are some signs that someone is poking around your Facebook account: You find strange posts in your timeline. Some of your personal details have been altered(user name, birthday, email) You find friend requests sent to people you don’t know. Your password has been changed. An increased amount of spam or suspicious links. Complaints from friends about strange messages or posts coming from your account. How to Confirm That Your Facebook Account Has Been Hacked Once you suspect that your account has been compromised, you can easily confirm by clicking on your profile picture in the top right corner and then clicking . \ Settings & Privacy After that, click . Settings In the top left corner, select , then click . Password and Security Password and Security Finally, under the section, ensure all active portals are associated with you. \ Device Logins How to Avoid Your Facebook Account Being Hacked To stop your Facebook account from being hacked, you’ll have to be very proactive in three different ways: Password Protection Privacy Settings Human Error 1. Password Protection It’s easy to make mistakes when it comes to picking out a password. For example, use the same password for more than one account online. These types of common mistakes lead to accounts getting hacked every day. two-thirds of Americans Here are some ways to make sure your password is as secure as humanly possible: Create A Strong and Secure Password Once a hacker learns your Facebook password, it’s all over. Your password needs to be easy enough for you to remember (or store somewhere) and long enough to be impossible to guess. One of the best ways to make sure that your password is strong is by including numbers, symbols, and a mix of upper and lower case letters. Safely Store Your Password If your password is one that’s not easy to remember, make sure to write the phrase down and store it somewhere only you know how to access. You can also use a password manager to store your computer's password safely. There may already be a password manager on your device, but it’s often best to find a password encrypting app that’s not built in. Create a Password Just For Facebook As a general rule, you should create a different password for every social media service you use. If a hacker gets your Facebook password, you don’t want them getting into your TikTok, Instagram, and other accounts as well. Make sure the strong password you create is just for Facebook. Change Your Password Every Six Months You can’t be too safe when it comes to password protection. Changing your password at least every six months makes it extremely difficult for hackers to crack it. This advice goes for any password you have. 2. Privacy Settings Facebook is aware of the problems that many of its users have when it comes to their accounts getting hacked. As a countermeasure, Facebook has provided a few privacy settings you can use to help protect yourself: Enable Two-factor Authentication You can think of two-factor authentication as an extra layer of protection that keeps unethical hackers from poking around your account. This is done by forcing you to authenticate your account by sending you a text message to confirm it’s actually you signing in. To enable two-faster authentication: Click on your profile picture, then open up the settings. In the top right corner, click . Password and Security Under , click again, then select . Account Settings Password and Security Two-factor Authentication From here, follow the on-screen prompts to turn this option on. Use Login Alerts If you really want to feel safe about your account security, you can receive an alert every time someone logs into your account. Once you know someone has logged in that’s not you, you can try to quickly solve the problem before it’s too late. To turn on login alerts, click on your profile image and navigate to your settings. Then click on in both the and . Password and Security Accounts Center Account Settings In the settings, select . Security Checks Login Alerts Make Your Account Private One of the ways that hackers figure out your password is by piecing together clues from your personal information. You can limit the personal information these bad actors get from you by making your account private. You can do this by opening up the Privacy page in your settings, then, in the Your Activity section, click Edit at the end of the “Who can see your future posts” line. From there, follow the on-screen prompts to make your account private. 3. Human Error At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how much protection you’ve surrounded yourself with if you let a scammer use social engineering against you. Here are some of the best ways to ensure that you don’t get tricked into giving your Facebook password: Don’t Accept Random Friend Requests One of the sneaky ways that scammers get your information is by creating fake accounts and befriending you. If you have your account set to tell your friends when your birthday is, for example, a scammer account in your friends list will be notified about your birthday and then use that information against you. To be safe, only accept friend requests from people you know. Only Use Trusted Computers Avoid using public computers to log in to Facebook as much as you can. You never know who the next person who uses the computer will be and if they are a good or bad actor. If you absolutely have to use a public computer, just make sure to log out of your account the second you leave. Block Suspicious People If someone you’re interacting with seems fishy and you don’t know who they are personally, block them. There are plenty of good people on the internet and you don’t need to deal with suspicious people. Going on a blocking spree is better than getting your account stolen. Final Thoughts Although hundreds of Facebook accounts get hacked daily, it’s easy to protect yourself once you know what to do. Make sure to follow the tips above to keep unethical hackers out of your account, and share this article with anyone you know who’s worried about their account getting stolen.

How to Protect Your Facebook Account From Being Hacked 

allows anyone to generate original music with just a text prompt. In this guide, I'll walk you through how to use this creative AI model to enhance your musical workflow. MusicGen Have you ever struggled with writer's block when composing a new song? Or do you want an AI assistant to help you brainstorm new melodies and harmonies? Facebook's MusicGen model makes musical ideation and experimentation quick and easy. We'll look at: MusicGen's capabilities for generating music from text Step-by-step instructions for using MusicGen via Replicate's API Let's see how MusicGen can unlock new creative possibilities for musicians, composers, and anyone looking to generate unique, production-ready music. Generate Original Music with Text Prompts MusicGen allows you to generate musical ideas just by describing the mood, genre, instruments, etc. in a text prompt. Here are some of the creative ways you can use text-to-music generation: - Get new melodic or harmonic ideas based on a text description when you're stuck. Overcome writer's block - Easily try variations by tweaking the text prompt. Experiment and iterate - Generate music in styles you're less familiar with. Explore new genres - Create custom background music for videos, podcasts, games, and more. Produce background music - Prime the model with an existing melody to generate variations. Remix melodies MusicGen delivers production-ready clips, in your choice of .mp3 or .wav format up to 8 seconds long. The samples can be used as inspirational sketches or incorporated directly into a composition. About the MusicGen Model MusicGen was created by 's AI Research team in 2023. It's an auto-regressive transformer model trained on licensed music data. Facebook The model generates 4 parallel melodic streams representing different musical elements like bass, drums, harmony, etc. This structure allows it to produce musically coherent compositions in a variety of genres and styles. MusicGen offers a few different model sizes. The base model used on Replicate is "Melody" which is optimized for text-to-audio generation. There is also a larger model optimized for melody continuation. You can learn more details about the model architecture in the and on the project GitHub page. Facebook Research paper Model Limitations Like all AI models, MusicGen has a few limitations: MusicGen's output is influenced by the provided prompts and melodies. Creative inputs can greatly impact the quality and uniqueness of generated compositions. The model's training data affects its musical style and output. It may not perfectly replicate every musical genre or style. MusicGen's generated music might require post-processing to achieve the desired level of polish and refinement. Understanding these limitations will help you make the most of MusicGen while also managing your expectations (or those of your customers). Understanding the Inputs and Outputs of MusicGen Inputs : Choose the model version for generation (e.g., "melody," "large," "encode-decode"). model_version : Provide a description of the music you want to generate. prompt : Influence the generated music by providing an audio file. input_audio : Specify the duration of the generated audio. duration : Choose whether the generated music should continue the melody of the input audio. continuation Other parameters like , , , and more allow you to fine-tune the output. top_k top_p temperature Outputs The output schema is a string representing a URI that points to the generated audio file. Step-by-Step Guide to Using the MusicGen Model In this section, we'll walk through a detailed step-by-step process to effectively use the MusicGen model for generating music compositions. Each step is accompanied by specific code snippets and explanations of what is happening. Step 1: Install the Node.js Client To begin, you'll need to install the Node.js client for Replicate. This client will enable you to interact with the Replicate API and run the MusicGen model. npm install replicate This command installs the necessary Node.js package named "replicate." Step 2: Set Up API Token Before you can access the Replicate API, you need to set up your API token as an environment variable. This token will authenticate your requests to the API. export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=your_api_token Replace with your actual Replicate API token. your_api_token Step 3: Run the Model and Generate Music Now, let's run the MusicGen model to generate music compositions based on specified inputs. We'll use the Node.js client to make API requests. import Replicate from "replicate";

// Create a Replicate client instance
const replicate = new Replicate({
  auth: process.env.REPLICATE_API_TOKEN,
});

// Define input parameters for the model
const modelVersion = "melody";
const prompt = "Expressive piano melody";
const duration = 10; // Duration of the generated audio in seconds

// Run the MusicGen model
const output = await replicate.run(
  "facebookresearch/musicgen:7a76a8258b23fae65c5a22debb8841d1d7e816b75c2f24218cd2bd8573787906",
  {
    input: {
      model_version: modelVersion,
      prompt: prompt,
      duration: duration,
      // Other input parameters here
    },
  }
);

console.log("Generated audio URI:", output); In this code snippet: We import the class from the installed Node.js package. Replicate We create an instance of the client using your API token. Replicate We define the , , and for the music generation. modelVersion prompt duration We use the method to run the MusicGen model with the specified inputs. replicate.run() The generated audio URI is logged to the console. Step 4: Exploring Generated Audio After running the model, you'll receive an audio URI pointing to the generated music composition. You can use this URI to access and explore the generated audio. That's it! At this point, you have successfully utilized the MusicGen model to create a music composition based on your inputs. Conclusion Congratulations! You've successfully completed the step-by-step guide to using the MusicGen model for music composition. By following these instructions, you've harnessed the power of AI to generate unique and creative musical compositions. As you continue your journey into the world of AI-driven music, don't hesitate to experiment with different inputs and parameters to explore a wide range of musical possibilities. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out or refer to the resources mentioned in this guide. Happy music composition with AI! Further Reading If you're interested in exploring audio-related topics, here are some relevant articles that delve into AI applications for audio generation, manipulation, and analysis: Audioldm: Text-to-Audio Generation with Latent Diffusion Models Converting Speech into Text with OpenAI's Whisper Model Learn How to Harness the Power of AI for Lip-Syncing Videos with This Comprehensive Guide Also published here.

Make Music With Text Prompts Using Facebook’s MusicGen

Facebook struck launch gold with Threads, passing 100 million users in its first week by creating a frictionless sign-up via Instagram and keeping the product simple. In doing so, Threads has - despite the predicted drop-off that has it averaging around 20 million daily active users - cemented itself as Meta’s first successful product launch since Facebook. The surprise launch and stronger-than-expected user numbers of the “Twitter-killer” to be has invited pundits to take a trip down memory lane and recall all of the times Meta botched similar roll-outs: “Snapchat killer” Poke, “Gmail killer” Facebook E-Mail, “bitcoin killer” Libra, “FaceTime killer” Portal, “iPhone killer” Facebook phone, and so on and so forth. But there’s one lesser-known failure that is rarely given a proper look despite being a natural product extension and clear multi-billion dollar opportunity: Facebook Gifts. The Tale of Facebook Gifts Facebook Gifts was announced at the end of 2012 in a : the social network allowed users to send gifts to friends, with special emphasis on the previously-almighty Facebook birthday, engagements, or other life achievements. company blog post The gift-giver would select a gift, attach a digital card, and hit send. The recipient would see a “wrapped” gift on their wall, open it to reveal the gift and a personal message, enter their physical address, and receive the gift a few days later. Facebook even offered the recipient the opportunity to modify colors, sizes, and flavors, or exchange the gift for something of equal value. This may read like feature creep and a cheap attempt to jumpstart Meta’s struggling social e-commerce efforts in 2023, but it’s important to remember the context of 2012: when Facebook was a birthday juggernaut. The Facebook birthday became so prevalent and part of the zeitgeist, multiple articles were penned by people who described being . At its peak, an estimated 20% of one’s Facebook friends could be expected to post on your wall, resulting in an average of more than 100 notifications on one’s birthday. overwhelmed by the volume of birthday wishes Birthdays were such a high-traffic part of the Facebook experience that company product manager the question, “How would you improve Facebook Birthdays?” interviews once included The improvement of choice became deeper engagement: Facebook Gifts was born. Analysts and reporters were bullish on the concept, sure Gifts would turn into a profit center worth hundreds of millions in revenue. The Facebook Gifts marketplace launched with typical gift fare: chocolates, stuffed animals, and gift cards. If that doesn’t excite you, you’re not alone. So few people purchased physical gifts that Facebook pivoted the product to focus on digital gift cards. The pivot kept the feature afloat, but Facebook made a few errors that kept it from ever truly taking off. Facebook, which has never been shy about leveraging its interest graph and user data to drive advertising outcomes, prevented Facebook Gifts from doing the same. It seems like there are so many simple opportunities: Facebook knows who my dad is, when it’s his birthday, that he likes golf, and (probably, at the time) a bunch of location data that would have enabled a meaningful offer from any major golf brand. Targeted commerce transactions with clear attribution, like the one I just described, would be an easy sell for a direct-to-consumer brand or online re-seller, but Facebook’s sales org never got a crack at it as they instead chose to focus on mass appeal. Even those who enjoyed the Facebook Gifts experience likely never got to use it for a second full cycle: if your mom enjoyed the Facebook Gift she received in 2013, you had to go find it elsewhere in 2014. Facebook’s convictions were so weak here, they shut it down after about a year. The biggest miss isn’t the millions (or billions) of incremental revenue they should have earned in the past decade; it’s they didn’t take advantage of this window of opportunity to build a strong commerce arm that they so sorely need today. Their current efforts to deliver commerce on social (primarily via Instagram) are still clunky, and they’re still struggling to onboard great partners. Their failure to activate the next layer of birthdays on Facebook accelerated the drift into irrelevance for Facebook's Birthday. By my own experience ( ), Facebook birthdays are down 90% from their peak a decade ago. and confirmed by others While a person might expect to receive more than 100 birthday messages on the platform in 2013, that number has shrunk to 6-12. This is despite adding 1.6 billion new users since then - all of whom have birthdays. To their credit, Facebook to keep birthday engagement alive. In 2013, they started notifying you when your friends had birthdays. In 2014, they started doing cards, and in 2015, prompted people to leave video birthday wishes. tried The platform started creating celebratory videos from previously-uploaded content in 2016 and rolled out birthday charity fundraisers in 2017. But this doesn’t seem like innovation or anything that leads to the kind of opportunity they fumbled with Gifts. It reads like desperation to re-capture that Facebook birthday magic, and trying a little too hard. Coupling this trend with the rapid fragmentation of social media, with people retreating into their niche social networks and private group corners where they find more signal and less noise, it should be no surprise that Facebook features have also splintered off. Startups like use some special magic sauce to create a single-use app that brings birthdays back to the basics: ensuring that you don’t become that bad friend who misses your friend’s birthday. Birthday App Birthday App doesn’t push you to post publicly or over-complicate things, they just encourage simple engagement with your friend on their special day. It’s not surprising the app is gaining traction, but it is interesting to see Gen Z talk about it on Tik Tok, especially given their general distaste for Facebook and lack of history with the Facebook birthday experience. If recent history is any indication, it won’t be long before Facebook attempts to capture that Gen Z attention with a standalone Birthday app of their own - likely with a sign-on via Instagram.

Facebook

facebook.com

87,314https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100094381808273&mibextid=https://www.facebook.com/mahmudulhasan.cono?mibextid=https://www.facebook.com/mahmudulhasan.cono?mibextid=ZbWKwLhttps://www.facebook.com/mahmudulhasan.cono?mibextid=ZbWKwL employees

Since 2004

COMPANY RANKING

Facebook

EVERGREEN INDEX #1

See more notable links about Facebook

Read More Tech Stories Related to #Facebook

Facebook

Facebook

facebook.com

87,314https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100094381808273&mibextid=https://www.facebook.com/mahmudulhasan.cono?mibextid=https://www.facebook.com/mahmudulhasan.cono?mibextid=ZbWKwLhttps://www.facebook.com/mahmudulhasan.cono?mibextid=ZbWKwL employees

Since 2004

COMPANY RANKING

Facebook

EVERGREEN INDEX #1

Facebook’s Stories on HackerNoon

Facebook News & MentionsComplete List

See more notable links about Facebook

Read More Tech Stories Related to #Facebook

Facebook