How to Add Form Participation Support to Web Components

Many years ago when the web platform began to really improve, when everything was "HTML5 this" and "HTML5 that", I remember being particularly excited by the updates to forms. I started my web career doing a lot of form processing and have always thought it was one of the more important aspects of the platform. Anything that improved that was a good thing. In my explorations of web components, I was to discover that web components can be participants in forms. So what do we mean by that? ecstatic What's a Form Field? Form fields have a number of different features, including: Including a name and value as part of the overall form. This is the bare minimum thing a form field provides. Participate in form validation with custom logic. Reset, which means different things to different fields. Autocomplete Restore (like if you go back after submitting a form, or re-open a closed browser) Handle being disabled Handle being focused That's quite a bit, and I'm probably forgetting something, but given the power of forms, the complexity is probably not too surprising. Form Participation in Web Components The good news is that, as long as you write the code for it, a custom web component can 100% participate in a form. The platform gives you the ability to set up the association, handle things like reset logic and autocomplete/restore, specify custom logic, and the rest of the expected behaviors as well. In my research on this topic, I ran across multiple articles on it (and I'll share those at the very end), and in general it didn't seem too hard to do, but I ran into an issue that stopped me completely before I figure it out. Let's start off by looking at the bare minimum requirements for a web component that will work in a form. The First Example Ok, let's begin with a simple component that doesn't actually do anything: class FormComponent extends HTMLElement {

constructor() { super(); this.attachShadow({mode:'open'}); } connectedCallback() { this.shadowRoot.innerHTML = ` WC Input:

`;

} }

if(!customElements.get('form-component')) customElements.define('form-component', FormComponent); This component, creatively-named , simply outputs a bit of text and a form field within it's shadow DOM. To start participating in forms, we begin by adding a static value to the class: form-component formAssociated static formAssociated = true; Next, in our constructor, we use like so: attachInternals this.internals = this.attachInternals(); The method (documented on MDN) adds support for forms. In some examples, I saw private members used for the pointer, or 'fake' private members using names like . That's not required, but you may see it in the wild. attachInternals here internals_ Then we need logic to set the value in terms of what the form is going to send. That's a bit wordy, but essentially there is a special way for your code to set the value that represents itself in the form. This is done like so: this.internals.setFormValue("something here"); And in theory, that's it. In practice, I saw something else that was required as well. And maybe it was obvious, but it wasn't for me. In order for your custom component to be a part of the form, it must use the attribute. If you are building a form that will post to a server and using JavaScript instead, then this is how it's always been. But it just didn't click to me that I needed it and kept seeing my web component value missing in the post. Anyway, just add a : name not name Let's consider an example, and let me preface it by saying this is a bit messy. I spent a good amount of time messing around with stuff when it wasn't working right. class FormComponent extends HTMLElement {

static formAssociated = true;

constructor() { super(); this.internals = this.attachInternals(); this.attachShadow({mode:'open'}); } connectedCallback() { this.shadowRoot.innerHTML = ` WC Input:

`; // set a default this.internals.setFormValue('');

const input = this.shadowRoot.querySelector('input'); input.addEventListener('change', () => { this.internals.setFormValue(input.value); });

}

// This is just to test something get value() { return 'moo'; } }

if(!customElements.get('form-component')) customElements.define('form-component', FormComponent); Alright, in my constructor, I'm setting up a shadow DOM as well as attaching internals as described before. In , I output a bit of HTML. I want you to notice the there. This is what is sent on posting the form, instead it's the name used when the component is in the DOM. I kept that there as a reminder to myself. connectedCallback name not The next line sets a form value of an empty string. Why? Here was another interesting tidbit. If I submitted my form without typing anything, the form field did show up in the post. This was not how other form fields acted, so for example, a text field. My guess is that with no value, it was null, so it didn't get sent along. Starting off by setting it to a string means I'd at least get the form field name there and an empty value. not Finally, I find the input field and listen for change events. When that fires, I update the form value. That last bit of code, the getter for , is a bit of trash in this example but demonstrates something interesting. If in my code I query selected my tag and output the value, I got nothing, even if I had typed something. That's because there wasn't a property of the web component. There an associated form value, that's set with , but it is the same as a property itself. value form-component value is setFormValue not value I may not have done the best job explaining that and I apologize, but it makes sense. You can test this below. All I'm doing in the form action is posting to an echo service. kinda https://codepen.io/cfjedimaster/pen/qBJgwbB?embedable=true The Better Example For my first "real" example (and this will still be somewhat incomplete), I thought it would be cool to build a "gradient" form field. Essentially a form field that lets you pick two colors with the idea that they represent a color gradient. I'll show how it looks in usage before sharing the code behind it: Form Name:

Theme:

Now for the component definition: class GradientComponent extends HTMLElement {

static formAssociated = true;

constructor() { super(); this.internals = this.attachInternals(); this.attachShadow({mode:'open'}); this.color1 = null; this.color2 = null; } connectedCallback() { this.shadowRoot.innerHTML = ` - `; // set a default this.internals.setFormValue('');

const inputs = this.shadowRoot.querySelectorAll('input'); this.color1 = inputs[0]; this.color2 = inputs[1]; inputs.forEach(i => { i.addEventListener('change', () => { this.internals.setFormValue(this.value); }); });

} formResetCallback() { this.color1.value= '#000000'; this.color2.value= '#000000'; } get value() { return this.color1.value + '-' + this.color2.value; } }

if(!customElements.get('gradient-component')) customElements.define('gradient-component', GradientComponent); Let me focus on what changed from the initial example. In my constructor, I begin by creating two variables that will eventually point to my two colors. In my , I set up the display to be two input fields, using , separated by a dash. That could be prettier/cooler perhaps. I select them from the shadow DOM, add points to those two color variables, and then add event listeners for each. connectedCallback type="color" The event handler simply asks for the value and uses it in . My getter for takes the values from the two form fields and delimits them with a dash. So if I picked green and red, I'd get: . It would be up to the code processing the form to parse it, store it as is, or whatever. value setFormValue value #00FF00-#FF0000 While I didn't add validation support to this component, I did add support with the . This is called automatically if a reset button is clicked or is called on the form object. I simply set the values back to black. reset formResetCallback reset() As I said, I could do more with this, but I think it's pretty cool to start off with. You can play with it yourself below: https://codepen.io/cfjedimaster/pen/zYmegVv?embedable=true Resources # While researching this post, I came across some great articles that were helpful: by Danny Moerkerke Web Components Can Now Be Native Form Elements by Ryosuke Niwa ElementInternals and Form-Associated Custom Elements by Arthur Evans More capable form controls Also published . here

How to Add Form Participation Support to Web Components

Too Long; Didn't Read

@raymondcamden

Credibility

RELATED STORIES